The issue:
Whether it is better to buy an application from an established vendor or
to build a "home grown" database system.
Less than 10 % of software today is custom contracted, and that number is
dropping every year according to Forrester Research.
However, there are still a small group of managers that will consider
custom developed software.
You can be sure that managers are faced with the buy or
build decision every day. With so many searching for answers, and
with a wealth of experience from those who chose to buy or to build,
there are two things you can count on in helping you make this decision.
First, there are
well respected experts with no vested interest in either side who have
made their evaluation very clear. Second, there are clear facts based
on statistical research that cannot be ignored.
The expert opinion
on whether to buy or build can best be summed up by an article in InfoWorld (February,
2007), a widely respected journal for information systems. "Most IT execs say
they evaluate commercial software first. The rule of thumb is to
buy applications to the maximum extent possible to cut costs," this
according to Mark Lutchen, former global CIO of PricewaterhouseCoopers,
now head of the firm’s IT Effectiveness practice.
Clearly, the big 5
accounting firm has a responsibility to find the most cost effective
solutions for their clients. They can make such a blanket statement for
very important reasons…it is strongly supported by the evidence on
the much higher cost, long delays, and limited capabilities of custom
developed software.
The considerable
evidence regarding buy vs. build can best be summarized in 3 key areas -
Costs, Benefits, and Risks.
|
NOTE: We are not without a bias
in the Buy vs. Build decision. However, this article is especially
long because it includes important, objective references.
For anyone considering building a "home grown" system, we
strongly recommend you read the article in detail and review the
references provided.
|